It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has been submitted that prosecutrix is a mature lady, aged about 25 years, and that her allegation that applicant has established physical relations with her on pretext of marriage are thoroughly false. In the FIR, the allegation has been made that applicant has established physical relation with her during last one year for several times on pretext of marriage but now he is refusing to marry her. It has been submitted that no date and place of alleged incidents of rape have been mentioned and only a vague allegation has been made that applicant has established physical relation on pretext of marriage. Leaned counsel has referred the statement of prosecutrix, recorded under Section 161 and 164 Cr.P.C, and submitted that her version is thoroughly improbable. The prosecutrix has refused for her internal medical examination and thus, her version is not supported by the medical evidence. It has been submitted that attending facts and circumstances of the case show that prosecutrix was a consenting party and that she was demanding money from the applicant and when he refused to pay, she has lodged this false case. It has further been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since
