Tarun v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed the bail application of Tarun accused under IPC Sections 363, 354 and POCSO, releasing him on bond and sureties after accepting counsel's submissions and citing jail overcrowding.
What did the court decide?
Release of applicant on personal bond and two sureties on conditions against tampering with evidence and influencing witnesses.
What the court decided
Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42579 of 2021
Applicant :- Tarun Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahboob Ahmad Siddiqui,Faizul Hasan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Hans Nath Pandey
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Ref: Criminal Misc. Amendment Application No. 01 of 2021
Heard.
Amendment application is allowed.
Necessary amendement to be carried out by the learned counsel for the applicant during the couse of the day.
Order on Bail Application
Heard Sri Mahboob Ahmad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Hans Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the complainant and learned AGA for the State.
A first information report was lodged against the applicant as Case Crime No. 92 of 2021 at Police Station-Loha Mandi District Agra under Sections 363, 366, 354 IPC, Section 7/8 of the POCSO Act.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering the merits of the case and jail overcrowding.
Whether the submissions of counsel and circumstances warrant the enlargement of the applicant on bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Tarun
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Ajay Bhanot
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/42579/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court