Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application by Vinod Yadav under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case under the U.P. Gangster Act. Court allowed bail subject to furnishing personal bond and two sureties.
Accused released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39266 of 2021
Applicant :- Vinod Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Pal Singh,Alka Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This Bail Application (under Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been moved for seeking bail in Case Crime No. 42 of 2021, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Mail, District Deoria, during pendency of the trial before the court below.
It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated; the Gangster Act has been imposed against the applicant on the basis of only one criminal case which has been shown in the gang chart, in which he has been released on bail. The applicant is neither gang leader nor he is an active member of any gang. He has not committed the alleged offence mentioned in the gang chart. Criminal history has been explained in para nos. 8 & 9 of the affidavit in support of bail application. He is in jail since 10.03.2021, if the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the facts as raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction, complicity of the accused and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .
Let the applicant Vinod Yadav involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 VPS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail is maintainable in an application challenged under the U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act.
Whether the applicant can be released on bail subject to personal bond and sureties.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vinod Yadav
State of U.P.
Anil Kumar Ojha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
