Vipin v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal bail application, the court granted bail to the applicant, exempting him from submitting specific documents, while expressing no view on the case's merits.
What did the court decide?
Order allowed; applicant released on personal bond with two sureties; exemption granted from filing FIR copy and bail rejection order copy.
What the court decided
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3850 of 2021
Applicant :- Vipin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Laxmi Kant Bhatt,Subhash Chandra Yadav
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
Re: Order on Exemption Application
Application is allowed.
The applicant is exempted from filing certified copy of first information report dated 22.11.2020 as well as free copy of bail rejection order dated 17.12.2020.
Re: Order on Bail Application
Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Sri Laxmi Kant Bhatt, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No. 247 of 2020, under Sections 323, 324, 307, 352, 506 IPC, Police Station Hastinapur, District Meerut, during pendency of trial.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in the pending criminal trial.
Whether the relief sought for exemption from filing certain documents requires to be granted.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vipin
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajiv Joshi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3850/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court