The Supreme Court recalled the bail granted to the petitioner in respect of three charges under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, while remanding him to judicial custody.
The petitioner was put in judicial custody and bail condition 60 of CrPC was breached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¼U;k;d{k la[;k 83½
nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 38423 o"kZ 2021
fldUnj fxgkj &&&&&& vkosnd izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
vkosnd dh vksj ls iwjd 'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k x;k bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk,A
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 392 o"kZ 2021]vUrxZr /kkjk 3 ¼1½ mRrj izns'k fxjksgcan ,oa lekt fojks/kh fdz;kdyki ¼fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1986] Fkkuk dksrokyh Q:Z[kkckn] ftyk Q:Z[kkckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gSa mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd fxjksg rkfydk esa vkosnd ds fo:} rhu eqdnesa n'kkZ;s x;sa gS] ftuesa ls nks eqdnesa /kkjk 60 vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e ls lEcfU/kr gS vkSj mDr rhuksa eqdneksa esa vkosnd tekur ij gSA tekur vkns'k] 'kiFki= ds lkFk layXud 2 ds :i esa nkf[ky fd;k x;k gSA vkosnd dk dksbZ iwoZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd lg&vfHk;qDr lktu mQZ ywyk dh tekur bl U;k;ky; }kjk nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk la[;k 26198 o"kZ 2021 esa vkns'k fnukad 16&8&2021 ds }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS blfy, vkosnd dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd u fdlh fxjksg dk eqf[k;k o lnL; gS vkSj u gh fdlh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k;ksa esa fyIr gSA vkosnd dk fdlh fxjksg ls dksbZ lEca/k ugha gS ,oa u gh lekt esa mldk dksbZ Hk; O;kIr gSA vkosnd fnukad 21&2&2021 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd tekur ij eqDr fd;s
tkus ;ksX; gSA
blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA
leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izLrqr ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIIk.kh fd;s esjs fopkj ls vkosnd dks tekur ij NksMuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
rnuqlkj vkosnd fldUnj fxgkj dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA mls mijksDr vijk/k esa fuEu 'krksZ ds lkFk lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij tekur ij NksM fn;k tk,A
¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA
fn0& 2&12&2021@v
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail granted to the petitioner can be recalled.
The extent of judicial discretion in recalling bail under Section 439 CrPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
foxkZ fxgkj
jkT; mRrj izns'k fdz;kdyki
c • dqekj ;kno
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
