Ram Kishore v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed bail application for accused implicated in forgery sections. Court found case out due to lack of involvement and long delay in FIR lodging.
What did the court decide?
Release of applicant on bail with personal bond and two sureties.
What the court decided
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36209 of 2021
Applicant :- Ram Kishore Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Prakash Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 340 of 2020 under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 I.P.C. registered at P.S.- Tirwa, District- Kannauj.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Applicant is not involved in the present case in any way. Applicant is neither purchaser nor seller nor witness in the alleged sale-deed. He has not prepared any forged documents. According to the prosecution, incident took place on 28.12.2011 and F.I.R. was lodged after lapse of nine years. Further submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 07.02.2019.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the facts as raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an accused falsely implicated and languishing in jail for nine years.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ram Kishore
Coram
Anil Kumar Ojha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/36209/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court