The court granted bail to the applicant, a co-accused in a cheating case involving a State Bank of India customer service centre, by personal bond and sureties based on co-accused bail and lack of flight risk.
Released on bail with personal bond and two local sureties on conditions ensuring no tampering and trial attendance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 70
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34719 of 2020
Applicant :- Sandeep Dubey @ Monu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Shukla,Anil Kumar Mishra,Prem Sagar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 154 of 2019, under Sections 420, 406, 409 IPC, P.S. Kaundhiyara, District Prayagraj.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that according to prosecution, applicant and three accused persons run Customer Service Centre for State Bank of India. They fraudulently withdrew customer's money by using their credentials in their absence and without consent. They did not deposit and money of the customers was fraudulently withdrawn without their consent. After investigation Shivam Pandey has been exonerated and co-accused Rajnish Pandey has been granted bail on 14.12.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 41535 of 2020. Therefore, the applicant is entitled for bail on the ground of parity. He also submits that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and, in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 24.05.2020.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, enlargement of co-accused on bail and perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Sandeep Dubey @ Monu involved in aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he will not tamper with the evidence and will not
pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and will cooperate with the trial. The applicant shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground of cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 7.1.2021 MAA/-
Sandeep Dubey @ Monu
Ali Zamin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
