Pappu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Haryana High Court quashed the Criminal Magistrate's Court's order of committal in an ABC case against a PSC recruiter, holding that the PSC was not a necessary party to the trial.
What did the court decide?
The order of committal passed by the Criminal Magistrate's Court is quashed, and the respondent is released. He shall stand committed for trial before the Sessions Court if the prosecution deems fit.
What the court decided
¼U;k;d{k la[;k 69½
nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 33611 o"kZ 2021
iIiw &&&&&& vkosnd izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh
vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 672 o"kZ 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 406] 420 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk fla/kkSyh] ftyk 'kkgtgkaiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks foLrkjiwoZd lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gSa mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd iz'uxr ekeysa ls vkosnd dk dksbZ okLrk o ljksdkj ugha gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds fo:} dksbZ fof'k"V Hkwfedk ugha n'kkZ;h x;h gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds dCts ls 15]000@&:i;s dh cjkenxh xyr <ax ls fn[kk;h x;h gS tks >waBk gS ,oa iqfyl }kjk fufeZr gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd cjken :i;k vkosnd dk Lo;a dk gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd dk dksbZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA vkosnd fnukad 13&1&2021 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Public Service Commission (PSC) can be impleaded as a necessary party in a criminal prosecution for abduction involving a PSC recruiter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Haryana
- respondent
Bhupinder Pal Singh
Coram
J. Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/33611/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court