Allowed

Yatindra Singh @ Yatindra Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Dec 2021BAIL/33218/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for an applicant charged under the U.P. Gangster Act. The court held that a case for bail was made out without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or witnesses, cooperate with trial, and refrain from criminal activities.

Yatindra Singh @ Yatindra Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 88

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33218 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Yatindra Singh @ Yatindra Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Dubey,Mahendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This Bail Application (under Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been moved for seeking bail in Case Crime No. 0230 of 2021, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Malpura, District Agra, during pendency of the trial before the court below.

¶7

It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated; the Gangster Act has been imposed against the applicant on the basis of four criminal cases which have been shown in the gang chart, in which he has been released on bail. The applicant is neither gang leader nor he is an active member of any gang. He has not committed the alleged offence mentioned in the gang chart. Criminal history of the applicant is explained in paragraph nos. 2, 3 & 4 of the supplementary affidavit filed in support of bail application. He is in jail since 07.07.2021, if the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the facts as raised by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶9

Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, nature and severity of punishment in case of conviction, complicity of the accused and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.

¶10

Considering the rival submissions of learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant Yatindra Singh @ Yatindra Yadav involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions;

¶13

The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶14

The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.

¶15

During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.

¶16

In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶17

Order Date :- 8.12.2021 VPS

Yatindra Singh @ Yatindra Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yatindra Singh @ Yatindra Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyanendra Dhaka Vs State of U.P

Anas Vs State of U.P.

Amit @ Chhotu Vs State of U.P.

Shahid Vs State of U.P.

Brajmohan and Another Vs State of U.P.

Phoolchand Pandey and Another Vs State of U.P.