Remanded

Arvesh Tiwari v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Sept 2021BAIL/31651/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the appellant in a criminal appeal filed under sections 41 to 47 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 against an order of forfeiture. The court considered the nature of the case, the appellant's conduct, and the evidence presented before releasing him on bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with directives to follow the orders of the court below.

Arvesh Tiwari Vs State of U.P. — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

¼U;k;d{k la[;k 69½

¶2

nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 31651 o"kZ 2021

¶3

vjos'k frokjh &&&&&& vkosnd izfr

¶4

jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh

¶5

ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ vkosnd dh vksj ls izfrmRrj 'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k x;k bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk,A

¶6

;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 255 o"kZ 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 41] 411] 413] 414] 419] 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk lajk; vfdy] ftyk dkS'kkEch esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gSa mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn ugha gS vkSj u gh og ekSds ij idMk x;k gS ,oa u gh mlds dCts ls dksbZ cjkenxh gh gqbZ gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd nkSjku foospuk lg&vfHk;qDr y{e.k dqekj ,oa vo/ks'k dqekj ds LohdkjksfDr c;ku ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd dk uke izdk'k esa vk;k gS ftudh tekur nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 43260 o"kZ 2019 ,oa 51520 o"kZ 2019 esa bl U;k;ky; dh ,d vU; ihB }kjk fnukad 19&10&2029 o 22&11&2019 dks Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA mDr tekur vkns'k] bl tekur vkosnu i= ds lkFk layXud 2 ds :i e s a vuqlayXud fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds fo:} 8 eqdneksa dk vijkf/kd bfrgkl gS ftudk fooj.k izfrmRrj 'kiFki= ds izLrj 6 esa fn;k x;k gSA vkosnd fnukad 25&6&2021 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶9

blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA

¶10

leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izLrqr ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIIk.kh fd;s esjs fopkj ls vkosnd dks tekur ij NksMuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶11

rnuqlkj vkosnd vjos'k frokjh dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA mls mijksDr vijk/k esa fuEu 'krksZ ds lkFk lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij tekur ij NksM fn;k tk,A

¶12

¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA ¼2½ vkosnd xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxkA ¼3½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxkA

¶13

;fn vkosnd }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosnd dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA

¶14

fn0& 20&9&2021@v

Arvesh Tiwari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arvesh Tiwari v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ankit Jaiswal @ Kunal Vs State of U.P.

Guddu Vs State of U.P.

Baliram @ Sadhoo Vs State of U.P.

Saleem Banjara Vs State of U.P.

Keshiya Devi Vs State of U.P.

Bhaiya Lal Vs State of U.P.