Allowed

Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Feb 2021BAIL/3102/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 3102 of 2021, the Allahabad High Court allowed bail to applicant Rajesh Mishra in a charge case under Sections 419, 420 IPC. The court granted bail without assessing evidence, citing the release of a co-accused and detailed conditions to ensure appearance and prevent tampering or abuse of liberty.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with personal bond and two local sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding presence, conduct, and geenented verification of the order.

Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 70

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3102 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shashi Kumar Mishra,Devi Prasad Mishra

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Ali Zamin,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶7

The present bail application has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No.87 of 2020, under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station Mugal Sarai, District Chandauli.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that coaccused Anoop Sharma has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.20311 of 2020, vide order dated 7.8.2020. Applicant's case is at par with co-accused released on bail. He further submits that the applicant has a criminal history of three cases, which has clearly been explained in para six of the bail application. The applicant is languishing in jail since 4.3.2020.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail, but does not dispute the factual aspects of the matter.

¶10

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, enlargement of co-accused on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the applicant is entitled for bail, let the applicant Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions :-

¶11

(i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence and pressurize the witnesses during trial.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of

¶13

this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶14

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

(iv) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(v) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶18

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 8.2.2021

¶20

m.a.

Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Singh Vs State of U.P.

Akhilesh Kumar Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Ram Prasad Vs State of U.P.

Jay Shankar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Mishra @ Sonu Vs State of U.P.

Nanhey Lal and Another Vs State of U.P.