Saddam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment orders the state and respondent stakeholders to ensure the presence and testimony of reluctant witnesses (Respondents No. 1, 2, 4). The accused were not present during the trial, but the court mandated the state to proceed without further resort to force against the reluctant witnesses.
What did the court decide?
The State and Respondents No. 1, 2, and 4 were directed to ensure the presence and testimony of the reluctant witness before the High Court.