The High Court allowed an appeal against a suspension order. The court held that the appellant's inaction justified the decision to relieve him of duty. The appeal against the suspension order is allowed. The order to suspend is set aside.
The order to suspend the appellant is set aside and he is restored to duty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 24524 o"kZ 2021
gksrh yky &&&&&& vkosnd izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 125 o"kZ 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 2@3 mRrj izns'k fxjksgcan ,oa lekt fojks/kh fdz;kdyki ¼fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e] 1986] Fkkuk lnj cktkj] ftyk eFkqjk esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gSa mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd ds fo:} ek= ,d eqdnesa dk vijkf/kd bfrgkl gS ftlesa og tekur ij gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosnd fdlh fxjksg dk lnL; ugha gS vkSj u gh og fdlh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k;ksa esa fyIr gSA vkosnd dk fdlh fxjksg ls dksbZ lEca/k ugha gSA vkosnd fnukad 25&5&2021 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA
leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izLrqr ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIIk.kh fd;s esjs fopkj ls vkosnd dks tekur ij NksMuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
rnuqlkj vkosnd gksrh yky dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA mls mijksDr vijk/k esa fuEu 'krksZ ds lkFk lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij tekur ij NksM fn;k tk,A
¼1½ vkosnd fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxkA
fn0& 30&7&2021@v
Justice Digitally signed by Justice Shekhar Kumar Shekhar Yadav Date: 2021.07.31 Kumar Yadav 12:10:44 +05'30'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an employee who is not a member of any association and has not made any representation can be relieved of duty for taking part in theemunulation of a constitution.
Whether there are any substantive or situational factors that justify the decision to suspend the appellant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gokul Verma
Registrar
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
