As per the FIR, it is alleged against the applicant that the applicant has attempted to commit rape on the daughter of the informant, who is aged about 13 years. It is also submitted that in the statement recorded Section 164 of Cr.P.C., she has changed the version of the FIR by stating that the applicant committed rape upon her. There is nothing unnatural found in the medical report of the victim, in which she was found to be 14 years. It is also submitted that the entire case of the prosecution is false as stated in paragraph no. 18 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application to the effect that the applicant is married having two children, the applicant and first informant both are farmers and two months prior of the alleged incident first informant borrowed Rs. 35,000/-, from the applicant in the name of agricultural work with the assurance to return the same within one month but when the aforesaid amount was not returned by the first informant, then on 17.01.2021 some heated arguments took place between them and thereafter a false and frivolous story has been created by the first informant falsely, to roped the applicant in the present case as learned counsel for the informant failed to deny the aforesaid fact as he submits that he do not want to file any counter affidavit. Applicant is of no criminal antecedents as stated in paragraph no. 19 to the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. Applicant is languishing in jail since 27.1.2021. There is no likelihood of fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence. Hence, bail, during trial, has been prayed for.
