Allowed

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Jun 2021BAIL/22276/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal bail application, the Court considered the applicant's claim of false implication and lack of criminal history. After hearing submissions, the Court granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits of the underlying charges, imposing standard conditions on bond and conduct.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail under Sections 452, 354A, 354B, 323, 504, 506 IPC via personal bond and two heavy sureties with conditions to attend trial and not tamper with witnesses.

Ravindra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 67

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22276 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Ravindra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Awadhesh Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sanjay Singh, learned AGA-I, appearing for the State and perused the material brought on record.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the applicant having no any concern with the alleged incident and he has not committed any illegality with the victim, the entire prosecution story is false and frivolous and the same is only developed by the victim for false implication of applicant, the said fact has been mentioned in para 18 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 18.02.2021. It has been pointed out that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶8

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel of both sides, nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge, reformative theory of punishment, and larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh v. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 2 SCC 22 and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a case of bail.

¶9

Let applicant- Ravindra , be released on bail in Case Crime No. 671 of 2020, under Sections- 452, 354A, 354B, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Mauranipur, District- Jhansi, on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties (One should be of a family member) each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶10

The applicant will attend and co-operate the trial proceedings pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶11

He will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶12

He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶13

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by the court concerned and in case of breach of any of the above conditions, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶14

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶15

In case of breach of of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶17

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶18

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶19

Order Date :- 10.6.2021 Arti

¶20

Digitally signed by Justice Vivek Kumar Singh Date: 2021.06.10 16:53:32 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arbaaz Vs State of U.P. and Another

Umesh Singh Vs State of U.P.

Mannu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Pawan @ Panna and Another Vs State of U.P.

Neelam Devi Vs State of U.P.

Chand Vs State of U.P.