Mausam Khan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
[Name hidden or irrelevant] convicted of conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC by a Sessions Court. High Court remanded the conviction due to the trial court's arbitrary decision to expel the appellant during the proceedings and failure to examine a crucial material eye-witness.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner convicted by the Sessions Court was acquitted and the appeal was allowed and remanded for trial for adherence to the procedural irregularities and to examine the material witness.