Allowed

Bhoore and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 Jun 2021BAIL/20957/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Misc. Bail Application under CrPC Section 439, the High Court considered an appeal for bail in a Gangster case. The court found it a fit case for bail, granting release on a personal bond and two sureties subject to various conditions including filing an undertaking and ensuring presence at trial.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties each, subject to specific conditions regarding undertaking, presence, and trial conduct.

Bhoore and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 78 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20957 of 2021 Applicant :- Bhoore And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ajai Kumar,Vijai Prakash Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State through video conferencing.

¶4

This bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicants seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.30 of 2021, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 at Police Station Ushait, District Budaun.

¶5

It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further contended that only one case has been shown against the accused-applicants in the gang chart, in which the applicant is on bail. Copy of gang-chart and bail order have been annexed as Annexure Nos.2 and 3 respectively to the bail application. The applicants are in jail since 14.01.2021.

¶6

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. opposes the application for bail.

¶7

Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶8

Let the applicant- Bhoore and Amit Hasan , who are involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶9

(i) THE APPLICANTS SHALL FILE AN UNDERTAKING TO THE EFFECT THAT HE SHALL NOT SEEK ANY ADJOURNMENT ON THE DATE FIXED FOR EVIDENCE WHEN THE WITNESSES ARE PRESENT IN COURT. IN CASE OF DEFAULT OF THIS CONDITION, IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT IT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PASS ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶10

(ii) THE APPLICANTS SHALL REMAIN PRESENT BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON EACH DATE FIXED, EITHER PERSONALLY OR THROUGH HIS COUNSEL. IN CASE OF THEIR ABSENCE, WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THE TRIAL COURT MAY PROCEED AGAINST THEM UNDER SECTION 229-A IPC.

¶11

(iii) IN CASE, THE APPLICANTS MISUSES THE LIBERTY OF BAIL DURING TRIAL AND IN ORDER TO SECURE HIS PRESENCE PROCLAMATION UNDER SECTION 82 CR.P.C., MAY BE ISSUED AND IF APPLICANTS FAIL TO APPEAR BEFORE THE COURT ON THE DATE FIXED IN SUCH PROCLAMATION, THEN, THE TRIAL COURT SHALL INITIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THEM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, UNDER SECTION 174-A IPC.

¶12

(iv) THE APPLICANTS SHALL REMAIN PRESENT, IN PERSON, BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT ON DATES FIXED FOR (1) OPENING OF THE CASE, (2) FRAMING OF CHARGE AND (3) RECORDING OF STATEMENT UNDER SECTION 313 CR.P.C. IF IN THE OPINION OF THE TRIAL COURT ABSENCE OF THE APPLICANTS IS DELIBERATE OR WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE, THEN IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE TRIAL COURT TO TREAT SUCH DEFAULT AS ABUSE OF LIBERTY OF BAIL AND PROCEED AGAINST THEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.

¶13

(v) THE TRIAL COURT MAY MAKE ALL POSSIBLE EFFORTS/ENDEAVOUR AND TRY TO CONCLUDE THE TRIAL WITHIN A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR AFTER THE RELEASE OF THE APPLICANTS.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶15

It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicants shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses.

¶16

The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶17

The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶18

The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶19

Order Date :- 25.6.2021/Ajeet

Bhoore and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhoore and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Vs State of U.P.

Rajeev Vs State of U.P.

Sagar @ Jaiveer Vs State of U.P. and another

Shivam Vs State of U.P.

Munna Khan Vs State of U.P.

Nimisha Alias Mili Vs State of U.P.