Allowed

Harshit Gautam v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 May 2021BAIL/20037/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application regarding charges under Sections 363, 366 IPC, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad allowed the applicant's release on bail. The court found merit in the submission that the applicant was falsely implicated and factored in the jail overcrowding due to the pandemic while imposing standard bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Harshit Gautam was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties in the like amount.

Harshit Gautam Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 6

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20037 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Harshit Gautam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kuldeep Singh Chahar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Kuldeep Singh Chahar, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State through video conferencing mode.

¶6

A first information report was lodged against the applicant as Case Crime No.92 of 2021 at Police Station- Etmaddaula, District- Agra on 09.02.2021 under Sections 363, 366 IPC.

¶7

The bail application of the applicant was rejected by learned ADJ/Fast Track Court, Agra on 02.04.2021.

¶8

The applicant is in jail since 13.02.2021, pursuant to the said F.I.R.

¶9

Sri Kuldeep Singh Chahar, learned counsel for applicant contends that applicant does not have any criminal history and has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is not assigned any direct role in the commission of the offence. Statement allegedly made by the applicant has been taken out of context and misinterpreted to falsely frame him in the case. The victim has since been recovered and has given her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Lastly, it is submitted by Sri Kuldeep Singh Chahar, learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant shall not abscond, and will fully cooperate in the criminal law proceedings. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence nor influence the witnesses in any manner.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid

¶11

submissions from the record.

¶12

Courts have taken notice of the overcrowding of jails during the current pandemic situation (Ref.: Suo Motu Writ Peition (C) No.1/2020, Contagion of COVID 19 Virus in prisons before the Supreme Court of India) . These circumstances shall also be factored in while considering bail applications on behalf of accused persons.

¶13

I see merit in the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and accordingly hold that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶14

In the light of the preceding discussion and without making any observations on the merits of the case, the bail application is allowed.

¶15

Let the applicant Harshit Gautam be released on bail in Case Crime No.92 of 2021 at Police Station- Etmaddaula, DistrictAgra, under Sections 363, 366 IPC on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court below. The following conditions be imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶16

(i) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either through his counsel or personally as and when directed by the learned trial court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶17

(ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii)framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 C r.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶18

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial, the trial court in order to secure his presence may issue a proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. In case the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶19

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶20

(v) The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.

¶21

(vi) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶22

Order Date :- 20.5.2021 AK Pandey

¶23

Digitally signed by Justice Ajay Bhanot Date: 2021.05.23 17:57:04 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harshit Gautam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harshit Gautam v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Parashar and Another Vs State of U.P.

Virendra Singh Vs State of U.P

Smt. Sharifa Khatoon Vs State of U.P.

Vivek Chauhan @ Vikku Vs State of U.P.

Gunga @ Mustkeem Vs State of U.P.

Kallu Vs State of U.P.