Mohd. Hasan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
l a [;k 69 ½ nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i=…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¼U;k;d{k la[;k 69½
nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 18463 o"kZ 2021
eksgEen glu &&&&&& vkosnd izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 18463 o"kZ 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 379] 411 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk e/kqcu ckiw/kke] ftyk xkft;kckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosnd funksZ"k gSa mls bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA vkosnd }kjk dksbZ vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k x;k gSA vkosnd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa uketn ugha gSA vkosnd dk uke lg&vfHk;qDrx.k jfo lksyadh] eks0 v'kjQ o vkflQ ds c;kuks ds vk/kkj ij izdk'k esa vk;k gS ftudh tekur Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA vr,o lekurk ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd tekur ikus dk vf/kdkjh gSA vkosnd ds fo:} orZeku eqdnesa esa fxjQrkjh ds ckn 7 eqdnesa >wBs ,oa QthZ ithd`r djk;k x;k gS ftlesa vkosnd tekur ij gSA vkosnd fnukad 29&12&2020 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA ,slh n'kk esa vkosnd tekur ij eqDr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA
blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's petition for restoration of pension is maintainable in view of the petitioner's voluntary resignation and subsequent indefinite suspension.
Whether the impugned order denying restoration of pension is sustainable in light of the petitioner's conduct and the suspension period.
What guidelines are applicable for the restoration of pension in cases involving indefinite suspension and resignation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State U.P.
- respondent
Uttar Pradesh
Coram
J. D.K. Jindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/18463/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court