Dismissed

Phool Chand and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Sept 2021BAIL/18389/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment deals with a writ petition filed by the State against Rekha Neha for the issuance of a warrant for her arrest. The court dismissed the petition and remanded the matter for further proceedings.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed and the matter was remanded for further proceedings. The petitioner was also directed not to make any further representation or intervention in the matter.

Phool Chand and Another Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

¼U;k;d{k la[;k 69½

¶2

nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 18389 o"kZ 2021

¶3

Qwy pUnz ,oa vU; &&&&&& vkosndx.k izfr

¶4

jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh

¶5

ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ

¶6

;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosndx.k dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 64 o"kZ 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471] 120ch] Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk dksrokyh [kyhykckn] ftyk lar dchj uxj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;~d ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶8

la{ksi esa vfHk;kstu dFkkud bl izdkj gS fd oknh eqdnek [kns: fu"kkn }kjk vUrxZr /kkjk 156 ¼3½ na0 iz0 la0 bl vk'k; ls izLrqr fd;k x;k fd oknh us ulhcqu fu'kka mQZ xqnjh ls viuh iRuh dqekjh nsoh ds uke ,d edku e; tehu fnukad 9&9&2015 dks jftLVMZ cSukek ls izkIr fd;k tks exgj iapk;r ds vfHkys[kksa esa edku la[;k 32 ds :i esa ntZ gS ijUrq mlh edku dks ehBk nsoh iRuh QwypUnz ds uke ij uxj iapk;r dfeZ;ksa ls feydj dj ,oa dwV jfpr dj ds edku la[;k 97 ntZ djk fn;k x;kA

¶9

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosndx.k funksZ"k gSa mUgsa bl izdj.k esa >waBk Qlk;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd vkosndx.k us iz'uxr edku dz; fd;k gS rFkk fnukad 20&5&2013 dks uxj iapk;r exgj ds vfHkys[kksa esa mldk uke ntZ gks x;k gS vkSj rHkh ls os mDr edku dk xgdj vnk dj jgsa gSaA xgdj dh jlhn fnukafdr 9&7&2015 bl tekur vkosnu i= ds lkFk layXud 4 ds :i esa vuqlayXud fd;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd iz'uxr edku

¶10

esa os vkt Hkh fuokl dj jgs gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd iz'uxr ekeyk nhokuh izd`fr dk gS ijUrq tkucw> dj mls vijkf/kd jax fn;k x;k gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd iz'uxr edku ds ckcr ehBk nsoh us okn la[;k 155 o"kZ 2015 lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k ;ksftr dj j[kk gS tks vHkh Hkh fopkjk/khu gSA ;g Hkh rdZ j[kk x;k fd uthcqu fu'kka ftlls vkosndx.k us iz'uxr edku dz; fd;k Fkk mudks mfpr dher :i;k 1]90]000@&fnukad 25&4&1994 dks nsdj dz; fd;k gS ,oa vkt Hkh ml ij dkfct gSA vkosndx.k dk dksbZ vijkf/kd bfrgkl ugha gSA vkosndx.k fnukad 17&2&2021 ls tsy esa fu:} gSA

¶11

blds foijhr fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk }kjk tekur dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA

¶12

leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, rFkk izLrqr ekeys ds xq.k&nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIIk.kh fd;s esjs fopkj ls vkosndx.k dks tekur ij NksMuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶13

rnuqlkj vkosndx.k Qwy pUnz ,oa Jherh ehBk nsoh dk tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA mUgsa mijksDr vijk/k esa fuEu 'krksZ ds lkFk lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k i= ,oa mlh /kujkf'k ds nks izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij tekur ij NksM fn;k tk,A

¶14

¼1½ vkosndx.k fopkj.k ds nkSjku lEcfU/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksxsaA

¶15

¼2½ vkosndx.k xokgku dks fdlh Hkh izdkj ls izHkkfor ugh djsxsaA

¶16

¼3½ vkosndx.k fopkj.k ds nkSjku Lkk{; ls dksbZ NsM NkM ugha djsxsaA

¶17

;fn vkosnd }kjk mijksDr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k tkrk gS rks fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks ;g NwV jgsxh fd og vkosndx.k dh tekur fujLr dj ldsxkA fn0& 1&9&2021@v

Phool Chand and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Phool Chand and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakhan Vs State of U.P.

Hasib Khan Vs State of U.P.

Jagdish Vs State of Up

Subhash Vs State of U.P.

Ramu Vs State of U.P.

Guddi Vs State of U.P.