Shobhit Sharma v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court quashed the cheating trial against the petitioner, A.O.C., citing lack of sufficient material to frame charges and procedural lapses by the trial court and Prosecutor.
What did the court decide?
Quashing of the cheating case against the petitioner due to lack of sufficient evidence for framing charges and procedural lapses.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur vkosnu i= la[;k 16448 o"kZ 2021
'kksfHkr 'kekZ &&&&&& vkosnd izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k &&&&& foi{kh
ekuuh; 'ks[kj dqekj ;kno] U;k;ewfrZ
jkT; dh vksj ls iwjd izfr'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k x;k bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk,A
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dh vksj ls eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 297 o"kZ 2019 vUrxZr /kkjk 420] 467] 468] 471 Hkk0 na0 la0] Fkkuk flgkuh xsV] ftyk xkft;kckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vfHk;kstu dFkkud ds vuqlkj] oknh izeksn dqekj] ofj"B lgk;d] xkft;kckn fodkl izkf/kdj.k xkft;kckn us ,d izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ fnukad 20&2&2019 dks bl vk'k; ls ntZ djk;h fd og xkft;kckn fodkl izkf/kdj.k esa ofj"B lgk;d ds in ij dk;Zjr gS rFkk mik/;{k ds vkns'k fnuakfdr 20&2&2019 ds }kjk ;g izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ djkus ds fy, vf/kd`r fd;k x;k gSA blh dze esa orZeku izkFkfedh ntZ djk;h x;h gS ftlesa vfHk;qDr 'kksfHkr 'kekZ dfu"B fyfid fnukad 6&2&2019 ls iwoZ Mkd izkIr ds in ij dk;Zjr Fks muds lEca/k esa Jherh jktjkuh iRuh vkse izdk'k us f'kdk;rh i= ds ek/;e ls voxr djk;k gS fd vkt ls pkj o"kZ iwoZ izkf/kdj.k dh e/kqcu ckiw/kke ;kstuk esa edku fnykus ds fy, le; le; ij muds ifr Jh vkse izdk'k ls fHkUu fHkUu frfFk;ksa esa :i;s 22-50 yk[k :i;s fy, Fks ftldh jlhn 'kksfHkr 'kekZ us mUgsa nh FkhA pkj ekg igys 'kksfHkr 'kekZ us ewy jlhn okil ys yh rFkk mldh QksVks izfr muds ikl gSA vkxs jktjkuh us mDr i= esa ;g Hkh mYys[k fd;k gS fd pkj ekg ls tc mUgsa vkoaVu i= ugha feyk rks mUgksaus izkf/kdj.k esa bldh tkudkjh dh rks mls irk fd 'kksfHkr 'kekZ }kjk nh x;h jlhnsa QthZ
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial court committed an error in framing charges for cheating against the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State of Kerala vs. A.O.C.
- respondent
Firu J. sukumar
Coram
D. Dinakaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/16448/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court