Suresh @ Bijli v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Held the bail application is infructuous because the applicant has already been convicted by the trial court, and thus disposed of the matter.
Held the bail application is infructuous because the applicant has already been convicted by the trial court, and thus disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 71
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13337 of 2018
Applicant :- Suresh @ Bijli Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that in the present bail application, the applicant has been convicted by trial court, as such, the present bail application has become infrucutuous.
The present bail application is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 21.12.2021 SKD
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a bail application where the applicant has already been convicted.
Suresh @ Bijli
Deepak Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court