In the absence of the applicant, the learned counsel withdrew the anticipatory bail application. The application was accordingly dismissed as not pressed for hearing without liberty to file a fresh application.
none
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9497 of 2021
Applicant :- Smt. Mithlesh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kamlesh Kumar Dwivedi
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri K.K. Dwivedi, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press the present anticipatory bail application on behalf of the applicants.
Learned counsel for the informant submits that he has no objection.
Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as not pressed with no liberty to file fresh application.
Order Date :- 19.7.2021
Sumit S
Mithlesh And 2 Others
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
