The court held that the anticipatory bail application became infructuous upon the submission of the charge sheet against the applicant and consequently dismissed the plea.
The application stands dismissed as infructuous; applicant may invoke proper remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9300 of 2021
Applicant :- Ravindra Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kedar Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned A.G.A. has informed the Court that the charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant in the present case.
Hence, the present anticipatory bail application no more survives.
Accordingly, the present application has rendered infructuous and stands dismissed as infructuous.
The applicant, if so desire, may invoke proper remedy for redressal of his grievance.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 Sumit S
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application survives after the submission of the charge sheet.
Ravindra Yadav
State of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
