Dismissed
Sumit and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCABAIL/9034/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9034 of 2021 Applicant :- Sumit And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Hridai Narayan Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicants. Learned A.G.A. is present.
Learned A.G.A. has submitted that the investigation has already been completed and the accusations against all the four accused-applicants namely Sumit Amit Rahul and Krishna have been found to be false, hence, the present application for anticipatory bail has become infructuous.
In view of above, the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous, hence, the same is rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.7.2021 sailesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be accepted or rejected as infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sumit And 3 Others
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court