Farman v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail allowed to applicant Farman in a rape case until cognizance is taken by the court on the police report, on terms and conditions of an earlier order.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted until cognizance is taken by the court on the police report.
What the court decided
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 898 of 2021
Applicant :- Farman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar Srivastava, Noor Muhammad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mehdi Abbas
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Mehdi Abbas, learned counsel for and learned AGA for the State.
Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application
This exemption application is allowed.
Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application
The instant Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with a prayer to grant an anticipatory bail to the applicant, namely, Farman , in Case Crime No.- 298 of 2020, under Sections- 376, 323, 504 IPC, Police Station- Debai, DistrictBulandshahar.
Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P., hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Farman
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/898/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court