The anticipatory bail application was dismissed by the Hon'ble Court as it was found to be infructuous after the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8566 of 2021
Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Pandey And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Pratap Singh,Anil Kumar Pathak
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Avdhesh Chandra Nigam
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 24.6.2021 Saif
Jitendra Kumar Pandey And 2 Others
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
