Dismissed

Rajeev Ranjan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC2 Aug 2021ABAIL/8335/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. It held that no good ground was made out for anticipatory bail and directed the applicant to move a regular bail application before the trial court for consideration and disposal on the same day.

What did the court decide?

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed by directing the applicant to move a regular bail application before the trial court.

Rajeev Ranjan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 50

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8335 of 2021 Applicant :- Rajeev Ranjan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Muktesh Kumar Singh,Ramkripal Yadav,Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashutosh Kumar Pandey,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava

¶3

Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶5

This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.28 of 2021, under Sections - 323, 308, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station - Saiyyadraza, District - Chandauli, during the pendency of trial.

¶6

Urge has been made on behalf of the applicant that it is a cross case and both the sides sustained injury in the alleged incident. The applicant has no concern with the offence alleged against him. The applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No offence has been committed by the applicant. In case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility of misusing the liberty of anticipatory bail.

¶7

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶8

After considering the rival submissions raised by both the parties and the averments contained in this anticipatory bail application, obviously the documents placed on record carry substantive allegations, which have been backed up by the sufficient material against the applicant. No good ground is made out for interference.

¶9

However, the relief sought by the applicant can be well obtained by moving appropriate regular bail application before the court concerned. Therefore, it is provided that in case the applicant appears before the court concerned within three weeks from today and moves appropriate application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the court concerned on the same day.

¶10

With the aforesaid observation, this application stands disposed of.

¶11

The observation made herein above will have no bearing upon the merit of the case.

¶12

Order Date :- 2.8.2021 rkg

Rajeev Ranjan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajeev Ranjan Singh v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep Verma Vs State of Up and Another

Pratap Singh Vs State of U.P.

Indresh Rai Vs State of U.P.

Guddu Vishwakarma Vs State of U.P.and Another

Farhat Jahan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Suneel Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another