Mujphphar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5725 of 2021
Applicant :- Mujphphar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Bhushan Prasad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. Learned A.G.A. is present.
From perusal of record it appears that on earlier two dates also, none was present on behalf of the applicant.
In view of above, the anticipatory bail application is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.7.2021
sailesh
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mujphphar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/5725/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court