Anticipatory bail application was not pressed by the counsel for the applicants. The application was dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to approach for regular bail later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5027 of 2021
Applicant :- Zarif And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Sisodia,Mohd. Naushad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press this Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail Application.
Hence, this Criminal Miscellaneous Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as not pressed .
However, applicants are free to agitate their claim at the stage of regular bail before the appropriate court.
The observation so made in the body of this order shall not prejudice proceeding of the lower court while deciding the case on merit.
Order Date :- 17.8.2021
Raj
Zarif And 6 Others
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
