Dayavati v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application by Dayavati was dismissed by the High Court on 4.1.2021 for want of prosecution as no one appeared to press the matter. Interim orders were vacated.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4990 of 2020
Applicant :- Dayavati Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Singh,Shivangi Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application.
It is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 4.1.2021 Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by JUSTICE SIDDHARTH Date: 2021.01.04 16:47:43 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dayavati
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/4990/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court