Disposed

Guru Charan and 8 Others v. State of U.P.and Another

Allahabad HC24 Feb 2021ABAIL/3905/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court refused to grant anticipatory bail due to lack of exceptional grounds. Instead, it directed the applicants to surrender within 90 days; if they do, their bail prayer will be considered per settled law. No coercive action was taken pending compliance.

What did the court decide?

No anticipatory bail granted coonditionally on surrender within 90 days; no coercive action pending.

Guru Charan and 8 Others Vs State of U.P.and Another — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3905 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Guru Charan And 8 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Guru Charan, Dharamveer, Smt. Kamlesh, Rahul, Mohit, Asha, Poonam, Balveer and Sonu alias Narender, with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No.01 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station- Mahila Thana, District- Bijnor, during pendency of trial.

¶7

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgement of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not finds any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶8

However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed, on the request of counsel for the applicants, that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 90 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as per the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P .

¶9

Till then no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶10

However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶11

It is made clear that the applicants will not be granted any further time by this court for surrendering before the court below as directed above.

¶12

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of .

¶13

Order Date :- 24.2.2021 SS

Guru Charan and 8 Others v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guru Charan and 8 Others v. State of U.P.and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Than Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Ahmad Ali Vs State of U.P.

Vivek Singh Vs State of U.P and 3 Others

Mehtab Vs State of U.P.

Rambabu @ Ram Prakash Sah Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhruv Kumar @ Dhruv Vs State of U.P. and Another