Disposed

Hari Om v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Feb 2021ABAIL/3514/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court addressed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Finding no exceptional grounds to grant immediate bail despite the P. Chidambaram precedent, the court ordered surrender within 90 days for consideration of bail under Amrawati guidelines, with threats of coercive action for default.

What did the court decide?

Direction to appear and surrender within 90 days for bail consideration; no coercive action pending compliance.

Hari Om Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3514 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Hari Om Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravindra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

¶7

This exemption application is allowed.

¶8

Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application

¶9

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Hari Om, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 226 of 2015, under Sections- 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)X of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station- Nagar, District- Basti, during pendency of trial.

¶10

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgement of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not finds any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and on the request of learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that in case the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 90 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as per the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).

¶12

Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

¶13

However, in case, the applicant does not appears before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶14

It is made clear that the applicant will not be granted any further time by this court for surrendering before the court below as directed above.

¶15

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of.

¶16

Order Date :- 22.2.2021 KS

Hari Om v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hari Om v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Sagar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Ashiq Ahmad @ Asib and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Akbar Ali Khan @ Moin Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mahbub Ali @ Mahbub Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kasim Vs State of U.P.

Omendra Vs State of U.P.