Dismissed

Ram Bahadur @ Master Ji and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC19 Feb 2021ABAIL/3403/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed an anticipatory bail application despite finding no exceptional grounds for immediate discharge. It directed the applicants to surrender within 90 days and apply for bail, promising to consider their prayer as per settled law. No coercive action is pending during this period.

What did the court decide?

Exemption allowed; applicants directed to surrender within 90 days to apply for bail; no coercive action till then.

Ram Bahadur @ Master Ji and Another Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3403 of 2021 Applicant :- Ram Bahadur @ Master Ji And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Deepak Singh Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶4

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

¶5

This exemption application is allowed.

¶6

Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application

¶7

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Ram Bahadur @ Master Ji and Sanjeev Kumar with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 0052 of 2021, under Sections- 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Izzatnagar, District- Bareilly, during pendency of trial.

¶8

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgement of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not finds any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶9

However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed, on the request of counsel for the applicants, that in case the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 90 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as per the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P .

¶10

Till then no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.

¶11

However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶12

It is made clear that the applicants will not be granted any further time by this court for surrendering before the court below as directed above.

¶13

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of .

¶14

Order Date :- 19.2.2021 Ruchi Agrahari

Ram Bahadur @ Master Ji and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bahadur @ Master Ji and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Vs State of U.P. and and Another

Raghvendra Singh Vs State of Up

Ankit Kumar and 4 Others Vs State of U.P.

Ashok Rawat and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kaleem and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Santosh Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P.