Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the applicant on the scheduled hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2533 of 2021
Applicant :- Sudhanshu Srivastava Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudarshan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
None is present on behalf of the applicant to press this anticipatory bail application. On the previous date also none was present for the applicant.
Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 29.7.2021 S.Ali
Sudhanshu Srivastava
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
