Court rejected anticipatory bail application as barred by Section 438(6) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment). No hearing on merits other than procedure.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2140 of 2021
Applicant :- Hamid @ Langada Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Kumar Mishra,Laxmi Pati Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Hamid @ Langada, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 14 of 2021, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Saroorpur, DistrictMeerut, during pendency of trial.
This anticipatory bail application is barred by Section 438(6) Cr.P.C (U.P. Amendment).
It is, accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 3.2.2021 SS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant is barred by Section 438(6) Cr.P.C. as amended in U.P.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hamid @ Langada
State of U.P.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
