The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by Mahendra Kumar. It was observed that no ground was made out for bail based on the case diary material showing the applicant granted a defaulted loan in another person's name.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed; pleas remain open for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 18832 of 2021 Applicant :- Mahendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pandey Balkrishna Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
5.In view of the facts pointed out by the learned A.G.A., no ground is made out for grant of anticipatory bail.
Order Date :- 30.11.2021/Faraz
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in the said case numbers.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahendra Kumar
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
