The applicant under Section 438 Cr.P.C. sought withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application with liberty to approach the Sessions Court based on the Full Bench judgment in Ankit Bharti.
Application dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file separate anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1812 of 2021
Applicant :- Jallaluddin Khan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Sri Manoj Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.B. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the State are present.
At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant prays for withdrawal of this anticipatory bail application with liberty to approach the learned Sessions Court and apply for anticipatory bail in the light of law laid down by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. & Another : (2020) 3 ADJ 575.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty without any opinion on the merits of the case.
Interim order in the matter, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 M. ARIF
(Samit Gopal, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. & AnotherReferred¶6
Ankit Bharti vs. State of U.P. & Another : (2020) 3 ADJ 575.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jallaluddin Khan
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
