Allowed

Roshan Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2021ABAIL/18003/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 18003 of 2021, the Court granted anticipatory bail to the applicant, Roshan Singh, in a case involving offences under Sections 352, 332, 504, and 506 IPC. The Court disposed of the application without expressing a final opinion on merits, noting the applicant had no criminal antecedents and no apprehension of flight.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail was granted on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount, subject to standard conditions.

Roshan Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 64

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 18003 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Roshan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajkapoor Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Shri Rajkapoor Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant - Roshan Singh , seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 64 of 2021, under Sections - 352, 332, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station - Goverdhan, District - Mathura .

¶7

At the outset, learned counsel for the applicant states that in exact similar allegations, co-accused Baba Harishchandra has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 18004 of 2021, vide order dated 6.12.2020. For the reasons contained in that order, the present applicant is also entitled for bail. Further, it has been submitted that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶8

At present, there are no criminal antecedents of the applicant shown as also no real apprehension has been expressed by the State of the applicant fleeing from justice, if the present application is allowed.

¶9

In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the present application pending or calling for counter affidavit at this stage. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail in this case, at this stage.

¶10

In the event of arrest of the applicant - Roshan Singh , involved in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail till conclusion of the trial, on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned on the following conditions:

¶11

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

¶12

(ii) The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

(iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court.

¶14

(iv) In default of any of the conditions mentioned above, the investigating officer shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶15

Present application stands disposed of .

¶16

Order Date :- 10.12.2021 shiv

Roshan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roshan Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kashyap Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajeev Kumar Prajapati Vs State of U.P.and Another

Abhishek Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Anand Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and Another

Movin Ahmad Vs State of U.P.

Kamta Prasad Vs State of U.P. and Another