Disposed

Tikam Chand Jaisawal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Mar 2021ABAIL/1689/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order on criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application granted exemption from coercive action. The court directed the applicant to surrender before the trial court within sixty days to apply for regular bail as per precedent. Failure to do so will result in coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Conditional exemption from coercive action if applicant surrenders and applies for bail within 60 days; otherwise coercive action will follow.

Tikam Chand Jaisawal Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1689 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Tikam Chand Jaisawal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Order on Criminal Misc. Exemption Application

¶6

This exemption application is allowed.

¶7

Order on Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶9

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Tikam Chand Jaisawal , with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 147 of 2020, under Sections- 406, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station- Ubhaon, DistrictBallia, during pendency of trial.

¶10

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgement of the Apex Court in the case of P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not finds any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶11

However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed, on the request of counsel for the applicant, that in case the applicant appears and surrenders before the court below within 60 days from today and applies for bail, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as per the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 260 as well asjudgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P .

¶12

Till then no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

¶13

However, in case, the applicant does not appears before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be

¶14

taken against him.

¶15

It is made clear that the applicant will not be granted any further time by this court for surrendering before the court below as directed above.

¶16

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of .

¶17

Order Date :- 1.3.2021 Rohit

Tikam Chand Jaisawal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tikam Chand Jaisawal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Saran Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dharmendra and 3 Othrers Vs State of U.P.

Mamta Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Ramesh Chandra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Triloki and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another