Allowed

Akash and 2 Other v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Dec 2021ABAIL/16861/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to Akash, Vikas, and Sureshpal in a case involving Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 354, and 427 IPC. The applicants were released on a personal bond with sureties upon furnishing them, subject to specified conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to conditions.

Akash and 2 Other Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 87

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16861 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Akash And 2 Other Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

This anticipatory bail application has been moved on behalf of the applicants Akash, Vikas and Sureshpal seeking bail in Case Crime No. 503 of 2020, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 354 and 427 IPC P.S. Muradnagar / Bapudham, District Ghaziabad, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicants may be released on bail.

¶7

It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that there was some dispute in between the informant and accused Akash after that first information report has been lodged on the basis of an application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. There is no medical report to show that any injury was sustained by the injured. The applicants have no criminal history to their credit. They have apprehension of their being arrested, so prayer for bail is made. It has further been argued that the co-accused Monu @ Deepak and Suresh have already been released on bail by a coordinate bench of this court. He has also drawn attention of the court towards the statements under sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. of the informant and the statements of injured and his wife wherein it has come that the injury was not of such nature that medical could be done and it is also mentioned therein that there was minor dispute between the parties. It is also alleged that the alleged injured is a drunkard person and when he is checked from his activities, his sister uses to file such type of reports.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the application for anticipatory bail and argued that the applicants are named in the first information report, therefore, they are not entitled for bail.

¶9

Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, taking into consideration the gravity of the accusation as well as the fact that there being no possibility of fleeing from justice,

¶10

without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, applicants are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.

¶11

The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶12

In the event of arrest of the applicants -Akash, Vikas and Sureshpal involved in the aforesaid case, they may be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-

¶13

(i) the applicants shall make him available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶14

(ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶15

(iii) the applicants would co-operate during investigation and trial and would not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶16

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

¶17

Order Date :- 17.12.2021 Gss

Akash and 2 Other v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akash and 2 Other v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rohit Kumar Rai Vs State of U.P.

Sri Niwas and 3 Others Vs State of U.P.

Sonu Nishad Vs State of U.P.

Ram Sharan Jatav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

akhilesh @ pintu thakur Vs State of U.P. through Secretary Home at Lucknow