The Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear despite summons and the list was revised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16541 of 2021
Applicant :- Geeta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shriman Narayan Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajesh Kumar Tiwari
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Even after revised list, none is for the applicant to press this application. It appears that either this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous or interest has been lost.
Learned AGA is present.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.12.2021 Kamarjahan
Geeta
State of U.P.
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
