Satendra Kumar v. State of u.p. and another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the Single Judge denied relief, observing that the applicant appeared to be avoiding the law by failing to comply with a previous conditional order, thus lacking grounds to exercise anticipatory bail powers favorably.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application is rejected; coercive action is permissible if the applicant fails to appear as previously directed.