Girdhari Lal Sharma v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous. The court noted the applicant had already been arrested at the time of hearing.
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous. The court noted the applicant had already been arrested at the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15669 of 2021
Applicant :- Girdhari Lal Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Subedar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Santosh Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that this application has become infructuous because the applicant has been arrested, and as such this application may be dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 Deepak/
Girdhari Lal Sharma
Ram Krishna Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court