Allowed

Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC22 Dec 2021ABAIL/15201/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order in a Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application (Cb.A.) accepted the ground for grant of anticipatory bail, making it final without directly interfering in the investigation, based on the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sushila Aggarwal case.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in the subject crime number till the submission of police report by furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties each of like

Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 75

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 15201 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Chandra Sen Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

¶5

Heard over anticipatory bail application, under Section 438 Cr.P.C., moved by the applicant- Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav, in Case Crime No. 26 of 2021, under Sections-399 and 402 I.P.C. Police Station-Machhlishahar.

¶6

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accusedapplicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very case crime number; neither applicant was apprehended on spot nor any incriminating article was recovered from him; his name has come in the confessional statement of the accused persons apprehended on the spot; no role has been assigned to the applicant; there is apprehension of arrest of the applicant by police, hence, anticipatory bail application moved before the Sessions Court, where it was rejected summarily; hence this anticipatory bail application with above prayer.

¶7

Prior notice of this bail application was served in the office of Government Advocate and as per Chapter XVIII, Rule 18 of the Allahabad High Court Rules and as per direction dated 20.11.2020 of this Court in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 438 Cr.P.C. No. 8072 of 2020, Govind Mishra @ Chhotu Versus State of U.P., hence, this anticipatory bail application is being heard. Grant of further time to the learned A.G.A as per Section 438 (3) Cr.P.C. (U.P. Amendment) is not required.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed.

¶9

Having heard and gone through material placed on record and considering the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the Case of Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) 2020 SCC Online SC 98 , but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, ground for grant of anticipatory bail is made out.

¶10

In case of arrest, the applicant, Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav , is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in above

¶11

case crime number, till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. before the competent court on his furnishing personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of Station House Officer of police station/ court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶12

(i) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required, if investigation is in progress;

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶14

(iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Court and if he has passport, the same shall be deposited by him before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned/Court concerned;

¶15

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Government Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant.

¶16

The Investigating Officer will continue with the investigation, if it is in progress and will not be affected by this order.

¶17

A copy of this order shall also be produced before the S.P/S.S.P concerned by the applicant, within a week, if the investigation is still in progress, who shall ensure compliance of this order.

¶18

This anticipatory bail application is finally disposed off.

¶19

Order Date :- 22.12.2021 Deepak/

Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailesh Yadav @ Nokhai Yadav v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manju @ Amit Vs State of U.P.

Upendra @ Uppa Vs State of U.P.

Arvind Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vijay Vs State of U.P. and Another

Pushpendra Vs State of U.P.

Kanhaiya Vs State of U.P. and Another