This judgment disposes of an anticipatory bail application. The court noted that the Rs. 173(2) report was filed and cognizance was taken. The applicant was advised to approach the Court separately, leading to the disposal of the application without granting bail.
Application disposed of; applicant advised to approach Court separately.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14889 of 2021 Applicant :- Mustkim And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned A.G.A. has informed the Court that report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. has already been filed by the police and the cognizance has been taken by the concerned Magistrate.
If so advised, the applicant may ventilate his grievance by initiate an appropriate proceeding before this Court.
With this observation, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 28.9.2021 Arif
1 issue framed by the court
Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mustkim and 5 Others
State of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
