Priyanka Agrawal v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous as the application has already been granted, resulting in dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
Anticipatory bail application rendered infructuous as the application has already been granted, resulting in dismissal.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 14525 of 2021
Applicant :- Priyanka Agrawal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Bhaskar Bhadra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amit Mishra
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the present anticipatory bail has rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant the present application no more survives, accordingly, the present applicant is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.10.2021 Abhishek Sri.
Priyanka Agrawal
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court