This court dismissed an anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the police had already submitted the final report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C., rendering the application ineffective.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13174 of 2021
Applicant :- Sintu @ Vishal Opposite Party :- State Of Up & Others Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Srivastav
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A.
Learned A.G.A., at the outset, informs the Court that the police, during the investigation, has submitted the report under section 173(2) Cr.P.C. against the applicant.
Under the circumstances, the efficacy of the present anticipatory bail application no more survives.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 Pr/-
Digitally signed by RAHUL CHATURVEDI Date: 2021.08.19 16:40:26 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sintu @ Vishal
State Of Up
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
