Munnu Yadav @ Ramvilas Yadav v. State of U.P.

Court No. - 75

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13066 of 2021

Applicant :- Munnu Yadav @ Ramvilas Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Raghvendra Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

Hon'ble Ram Krishna Gautam,J.

Heard over anticipatory bail application, under Section 438 Cr.P.C., moved by the applicant- Munnu Yadav @ Ramvilas Yadav, In Case Crime No. 55 of 2021, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B and 34 I.P.C., Police Station-Sidhari, District-Azamgarh.

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused applicant is innocent; he has been falsely implicated in this very Case Crime Number; he runs a shop of photostat and First Information Report was got lodged by Sub Inspector-Zafar Khan, on 24.03.2021 against the accused persons, written in it; he planted at sl. no. 4 and the accusation against him is that he manufactured the release orders which were held to be tampered one, whereas, applicant is of no concern; one accused Umashanakar@ Badak has granted anticipatory bail, in Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 9413 of 2021, by a coordinate Bench of this Court, and the same is at page 41 of the paper book; and there is every likelihood of arrest of applicant, hence this application for anticipatory bail is with above prayed for.

Learned AGA has taken notice of it; he opposed this application with this contention that vehicles were apprehended by transport authorities and were parked at Police Station, wherein, Case Crime Number, were got registered, then after, those were got released by their owners or drivers on the basis of release order; subsequently, it was found to be a forged and fictitious release order, then after these orders were got verified and found to be not issued by above officers; then after those accused persons were enquired, who had used those papers for getting their papers released, then they apprise that those documents were got prepared by the applicant and the applicant manage to flee from his shop, but the laptop from which papers were prepared, was recovered, hence, it is a white collar offence; it is a heinous offence; many other may be detected, who have misused such process performed by the applicant as well as his release on anticipatory bail may hamper the