The High Court rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Harish Chandra and four others against the State of U.P. in a case involving assault and rioting in Bulandshahr. The court noted that some injuries occurred but dismissed the application at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11634 of 2021
Applicant :- Harish Chandra And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Babu Sharma,Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vinod Singh
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 18.6.2021 S.Chaurasia
Digitally signed by Justice Saumitra Dayal Singh Date: 2021.06.18 16:45:53 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail ought to be granted on the facts and circumstances presented.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harish Chandra and 4 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
